Search for: "Lynch v. Pfizer, Inc. et al" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Relative of Risk > Two in the Courts – Updated
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
Tortini - http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog/
Courts and Commentators on the Use of Relative Risks to Infer Specific Causation
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Pfizer, 196 F. [read post]
Tortini - http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog/
The Doubling Dose
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
G.D.Searle & Co., 814 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1987)(per curiam) Bendectin cases Lynch v. [read post]
Tortini - http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog/
Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence on Relative Risk Greater Than Two For Specific Causation Inference
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
Tortini - http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog/
An Insider’s View of an Actual RMBS Securitization at Mandelman U.
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
(In case you’re wondering, the remaining five are Microsoft, Pfizer, Exxon-Mobil, Johnson & Johnson and ADP.) [read post]
Mandelman Matters - http://mandelman.ml-implode.com